I thought this was really well done, and then I started doing a little research. What I found out was that it seems that China isn't actually using the 60 GHz that Dana refers to, and are instead using a 2.5 - 4.9 GHz. If that's true, it invalidates a lot (if not all can't remember) of her presentation.
Erica you have a point, In the u.s. the ceiling for the frequency bands is higher then in the rest of the world though, which is the one thing that has my panties up in a bunch. however one of the documents that she showed that suggests that certain frequencies activate certain virus strains; did jump out at me!
Thanks for sharing this great film.
She raises good and essential questions.
The coronavirus seems to get worse with 5G.
( this does not mean that it can not spread without )
The first 2 of the 3 links about china are too old.
The 3th of june 2019 states :
"On the millimeter wave front, government regulators have identified candidate bands– 24.75–27.5 GHz and 37– 42.5 GHz, although allocation plans haven’t been crystalized."
These frequencies might have changed, or also cause similar health issues.
Anyway, 3 to 5 GHz can also contain new stuff that we have to learn to cope with, just like the virus.
After a couple of years, only few may die that easily from this combo.
However all these emfs will remain a burden to us and lots of other organisms, also when fewer people are dropping dead.